Why Ogden, Utah Doesn’t Burn Down Abandoned Buildings: A Comprehensive Analysis

Ogden, Utah faces the challenge of managing a significant number of abandoned buildings. These structures pose a variety of risks, including safety hazards, environmental concerns, and strict legal constraints. Understanding why Ogden and other cities might not burn down these buildings, despite the temptation, is crucial for making informed decisions about urban development and property management.

Challenges in Burning Down Abandoned Buildings

Local governments, such as those in Ogden, Utah, face numerous challenges when it comes to disposing of abandoned buildings in ways that are both cost-effective and legally compliant. Burning down buildings is not always a feasible or desirable solution, as it cannot simply be done without causing significant disruptions and adhering to stringent safety and environmental regulations.

Cost and Legal Concerns

For instance, burning down buildings legally often requires the removal of hazardous materials such as asbestos and other toxic substances. This process can be extremely expensive, potentially exceeding the cost of tearing down the structures through traditional methods. Even if a city like Ogden were to acquire ownership of these buildings, the expenses associated with asbestos removal and proper disposal could make burning the buildings impractical.

Additionally, the process would have to comply with environmental standards set by regulatory bodies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA strictly regulates the burning of homes and buildings to prevent the release of harmful chemicals into the environment, making this option less viable.

Alternative Solutions to Address Hazardous Abandoned Buildings

Instead of burning down abandoned buildings, many cities rely on alternative methods such as buying up the property and tearing down the structures for safety reasons. This approach ensures that the buildings, which can pose serious risks such as squatting and arson, are removed in a controlled manner.

For example, consider the case of the old Fred Meyer supermarket located on 12th and Wall. The building was vacant for a significant period and eventually became a safety hazard. In response, Ogden City acquired the property and demolished the structure to remove the risk. Similarly, cities might invest in new housing or commercial projects by repurposing abandoned land. For instance, Ogden City purchased a nearly vacant piece of land for the Ogden City Mall and transformed it into the Junction, an outdoor mall.

To incentivize the removal of buildings, some cities may offer financial assistance to developers or companies that express an interest in developing land. These grants can help cover the costs of demolition and other necessary improvements.

Why Demolition Is Often Preferable to Burning

Demolition is typically the more cost-effective and legally compliant option compared to burning. Demolishing the buildings not only removes the physical structures but also addresses the underlying issues that make these buildings hazardous. This approach can help prevent the spread of contaminants and reduce the risk of fire or other accidents. Furthermore, it allows for the land to be repurposed for new and safer uses.

Engaging with the Community

While the city may find it challenging to address these issues, engaging with the community can lead to positive change. Here are some steps residents can take:

Run for City Office: If you believe there is a need for change, consider running for city office. This allows you to bring the issue to the forefront and advocate for solutions that benefit the community. Write to Government Officials: If the issue is related to federal or state facilities, writing to representatives at the city, state, and federal levels can help raise awareness. This can be particularly effective if the abandoned buildings are associated with closed federal facilities. Hike and Document: Take the time to hike in areas near the abandoned buildings. Take photos and document the beauty of the surrounding landscape. Then, pen a letter to your representatives, highlighting the beauty of the area and suggesting opportunities for redevelopment. Include your photos to show the beauty of the region and point out areas that could be revitalized.

By raising awareness and advocating for change, you can help drive progress and improve the condition of these neglected buildings.