Why Immigrants Deserve to Advocate for Change

Why Immigrants Deserve to Advocate for Change

Often, when immigrants express a desire to change certain aspects of the country they have moved to, it’s viewed as a display of dissatisfaction. However, this viewpoint oversimplifies the complex emotions and motivations behind such actions. Immigrants originally had the option to stay in their home countries or continue to other nations. Choosing to move and integrate into a new society shows not just a willingness to adapt, but a commendable desire to improve that society.

Choosing to Stay for Improvement

For immigrants, the decision to move to a new country is not just about escaping difficulties but also about the hope for better opportunities and a more stable environment. Unlike many non-immigrants who stay in familiar settings, immigrants face the real possibility of returning to their home countries. Opting to stay and work towards progress in a foreign land reflects a genuine commitment to their adopted home. This drive to improve is a form of love and resilience, rooted in the belief that change can lead to a better future for their communities.

Adapting and Navigating Change

The experience of moving from one place to another, especially for an immigrant, involves adapting not just to a new location but also to new ways of living. This adaptability often means that immigrants may find themselves adopting new practices or even finding common ground with their new neighbors. However, this adaptation does not negate their right to advocate for changes that they believe would benefit both themselves and the society they are now part of. Just as a conservative Republican from Alabama might advocate for certain policies in Berkeley, or an Albanian in Birmingham, similar immigrant newcomers likely hold aspirations for positive change in their new cities.

Perspectives from the Trenches

Consider the example of two villagers from a war-torn village who immigrate to the United States. Both have undergone significant adversities but face different sets of realities in their new homes. The first villager, who successfully defended their home with firearms and subsequently moves to Chicago, finds the restrictions on firearms overwhelming. They advocate for the relaxation of these restrictions, drawing from their own experiences. On the other hand, the second villager, who lost their family due to mercenaries with firearms, moves to Oklahoma, where there are fewer restrictions. They, too, advocate for new restrictions, driven by similar but opposite experiences. Both individuals recognize that advocating for change can lead to a more informed and proactive society, understanding that such actions aim to prevent similar tragedies in their adopted homes.

It is important to recognize that both villagers’ advocacy stems from a profound desire to prevent or mitigate such situations in the future. However, the level of condemnation directed towards them can vary based on cultural and political perspectives. Those who tend to ask, “Why do THEY expect US to change,” often overlook the multifaceted reasons behind immigrants' actions. These reasons may include a wish to protect their communities, an understanding of the broader societal impacts, and a recognition that change can often lead to positive outcomes.

A Call for Empathy and Understanding

In conclusion, the right of immigrants to advocate for changes they believe in is essential for fostering a more inclusive and equitable society. This right is grounded in the fundamental belief that every individual, regardless of their background, has a stake in the ongoing improvement of the communities they live in. Aspects such as immigration policy, cultural integration, and the need for continuous societal advancement are complex issues that require a nuanced understanding and empathetic approach. It is crucial to embrace the diverse voices of immigrants and the changes they propose, recognizing that these voices often bring valuable perspectives and solutions to the table.