The Worst U.S. National Park to Visit: Gateway Arch National Park
Before the start of 2018, I wouldn't have called any one national park in the U.S. 'bad.' However, things have changed since then, especially with the redesignation of the former Jefferson National Expansion Memorial as Gateway Arch National Park. This park, located in the heart of bustling St. Louis, Missouri, now stands out as one of the least appealing destinations among the countless national parks in the U.S.
Comparison and Contrast
While many national parks in the U.S. are renowned for their breathtaking landscapes, exotic wildlife, or rich historical significance, Gateway Arch National Park falls short on all these counts. Previously, all national parks had something remarkable to offer: whether it was the majestic landscapes of Yosemite, the awe-inspiring grandeur of the Grand Canyon, the diverse wildlife of Denali, the stunning waterfalls of Shenandoah, or the intricate rock formations of Arches. However, Gateway Arch National Park offers none of these attractions.
Instead, it consists of a modern monument, a museum, and a small urban park. The arch itself, while significant as the starting point of the legendary Lewis and Clark Expedition, is no more impressive than any other structure. Visitors expecting to see the stunning natural beauty or historical artifacts they associate with other national parks will likely be disappointed. For this reason, Gateway Arch National Park has earned a distinction that few national parks can claim: being the worst U.S. national park to visit, at least based on scenic and historical appeal.
Why It's Not a Good Option
Despite its dubious status, it is an essential part of any cross-country road trip. Aspiring to visit all national parks in the U.S., this park stands as a landmark and serves as a historical marker of the nation's exploration history. However, the visitor experience is quite bland compared to the more engaging and picturesque parks.
The Good and the Bad
On the positive side, the park offers educational opportunities through its museum, which provides insights into the significance of the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Additionally, the urban setting might come as a pleasant surprise for city dwellers, offering a break from the chaos of the downtown area. The Arch itself, while not as majestic as say, the Grand Canyon butting against a cliff face, remains a significant structure with appeal for history buffs and those with a penchant for landmarks.
Conclusion
While Gateway Arch National Park may not be a top choice for those seeking natural beauty, history, or wildlife, it does serve a crucial purpose in preserving the legacy of the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Its status as the worst U.S. national park may well be a misnomer, as it not only represents a unique experience but also plays an important role in American history. For those who prioritize historical significance and cultural heritage, it remains a worthwhile visit, albeit not for its scenery or wildlife.