The Tragic Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits: A Personal Account
The Persecution:
The life of Kashmiri Hindus during the 1990s was a severe ordeal that goes beyond comprehension. They were denied the basic rights to practice their religion and were subjected to extreme forms of violence and harassment. The conditions under which they lived were reminiscent of a dystopian nightmare.
Restrictions on religious practices were rampant. Tika, a symbol of religious significance, was prohibited from being worn on the forehead. The use of burqa was a common mandate, turning any public appearance into a perilous event. Public rapes were commonplace, and the choice of dress could result in atrocities such as the brutal rape and cutting of a woman named Sharda, an incident that brutalizes and shatters the human spirit.
).
The state-sponsored violence against Kashmiri Hindus extended beyond individual acts of violence. Forced conversions and the use of individuals as spies were common. Kashmiri Muslims took on the roles of both performers and spectators of violence, perpetuating and glorifying the atrocities.
Mартин:
The severity of the situation can be gauged from specific instances, such as the forced message left for Kashmiri Pandit Aunty on a chit inside the hospital. The warning to either wear a burqa or never leave the house is a stark reminder of the terror that enveloped the community. This led to the immediate resignation of her job and an early move to Jammu, where they lived in constant fear and anguish.
Voices of Suffering:
The stories shared by Kashmiri Pandits themselves offer a poignant glimpse into the reality of the situation. Aunty’s doctor, who had also been a Kashmiri Pandit and a close family friend, recounted the grim circumstances during Ramzan, when non-Muslims were not even allowed to eat food. The manhandling of temples and the general climate of fear and humiliation were too much for the community to bear.
One story involves a professor and his family. His youngest son, a cricket enthusiast, was targeted because he was a Kafir. The child's innocent comment of waiting for the day he would drag the boy out of the city reflects the deep-seated hatred that existed. This example shows the violent and intimidating impact such comments and actions had on the community.
The Decision to Flee:
Both the doctor and the professor made critical decisions to leave Kashmir, fearing for their safety and that of their families. For Aunty, it was a matter of survival, while for the professor, it was a matter of caution. The decision to leave was not taken lightly, but it was a matter of securing a better, safer future. The subsequent silence of Aunty and the fear and anguish that still permeate the stories of Kashmiri Pandits speak volumes about the lasting impact of the exile.
Conclusion:
The systematic persecution and violence against Kashmiri Pandits in the 1990s, as narrated by several individuals, paints a vivid and heartbreaking picture. It is crucial to recognize the validity of these narratives and to ensure that such atrocities are not repeated. The perseverance of those who left Kashmir and the resilience of those who stayed behind continue to challenge us to understand and address the root causes of such persecution.
Let us honor the memory of those who suffered and work towards a future where all communities can live without fear or persecution.