The Mistaken Belief about Hillary Clinton’s Defeat
Many people subscribe to the notion that Hillary Clinton lost to Donald Trump due to some inherent flaw within her. However, a closer examination reveals that the reality is far simpler and more nefarious – Clinton lost because Trump employed cheating methods throughout the electoral process. This article explores the true reasons behind the 2016 election results and dispels the myth that Clinton was inherently flawed.
How Hillary Clinton Was Genuinely the Winner
The notion that Hillary Clinton lost to Donald Trump because she was not “bad” enough or intelligent enough is a long-standing myth. In fact, she was a highly intelligent and capable candidate who was denied the presidency due to systemic biases and unethical practices.
Throughout the campaign, Trump admitted to using deceitful tactics, dubbing himself as a 'Liar, Cheater, Stealer.' His campaign was characterized by relentless lies and sexist rhetoric, and the only way he managed to surplus his opponents was through underhanded means. It's reasonable to deduce that had he not cheated, Clinton might have ensured a victory.
Understanding the Election Results
The election outcome was not due to Clinton’s weaknesses or personal failings, but rather a result of electoral fraud. Trump's victory can be attributed to the manipulation of the electoral system, rather than Clinton's inability to win over voters.
Polling data consistently indicated that Clinton would receive more votes than Trump. In a direct comparison, as acknowledged by many, Clinton won the popular vote, whereas Trump merely secured enough electoral votes to win the presidency. The narrative that Clinton lost fair and square is a misrepresentation of the real events.
The Suspected Influence of Dementia Donnie
Speculation still looms regarding the role of 'Dementia Donnie,' a term often used to reference Donald Trump's apparent lapses in judgment and decision-making. Allegations about the president's cognitive abilities have been raised repeatedly, and many suspect that his behavior and policies are influenced by undisclosed medical issues. Such suspicions have significant implications on the legitimacy of his leadership and voter decisions.
The Clinton Foundation and Controversies
Concerns have also been raised about the Clinton Foundation, with some alleging that it facilitated the transfer of nuclear material to Russia and received millions in donations without direct involvement from Clinton. While her role in these matters is debated, it highlights the complexities and potential conflicts associated with political foundations and international relations.
Conclusion and Reflection
The 2016 election results were influenced not by the character or merits of the candidates themselves, but by a combination of systemic biases, unethical campaigning tactics, and potential scheme manipulations. Hillary Clinton was a strong and capable candidate who would have likely secured the presidency if the election had been fair and transparent.
It's important to critically evaluate the narratives surrounding political events and not fall into the trap of disregarding the various factors that can influence election outcomes. The truth often lies in the combination of verified facts and open-minded analysis rather than preconceived notions.