Is It Blind Following That Defines Holiday Celebrations?

Is It Blind Following That Defines Holiday Celebrations?

Is it genuinely the case that the celebration of certain holidays is merely a form of blind following? This question arises from the intricate interplay of history, culture, and personal beliefs, particularly when the origins of these holidays are obscure or poorly documented. Let us delve into this topic by examining a particular holiday, the Tag der Deutschen Einheit (German Unity Day), and its significance.

The Obscure Origin of Tag der Deutschen Einheit

Tag der Deutschen Einheit celebrates the re-unification of Germany on October 3, 1990, after 45 years of division. The significance of this relatively recent event means that its documentation and celebration largely owe to the societies that have since witnessed it. Yet, many individuals choose not to partake in its festivities; in my own case, I do not celebrate this holiday despite the day-off it provides.

Historically, the re-unification of Germany was a monumental event, symbolizing the end of a bitter division. However, one might ponder whether the celebration of such a holiday, born from political and social contexts, holds the same significance as one deeply rooted in ancient traditions. This brings us to the core question: is celebration based on cultural assimilation or personal belief?

Valentine's Day: A Case of Social Conformity

Conversely, there are holidays like Valentine's Day that are widely celebrated with perhaps less historical or cultural significance. These days often find their prominence through mass media campaigns and societal trends rather than documented traditions. The reason behind such mass celebration is often the adherence to what others do, a form of social conformity rather than personal conviction.

From Yule to Ostara and to Imbolc, understanding the pagan origins of these holidays provides a deeper insight into how they have been transformed by both Christianity and modern media. Though the precise origins of many modern holidays are often clouded, their celebrations have persisted due to a combination of cultural inheritance and collective memory. But does this mean that we, as individuals, should celebrate simply because everyone else does?

The Illogical Fondling Day

Even more perplexing are holidays such as National Lick Your Brother Day. This day, often celebrated with joy and sincerity, leads one to question the logic behind such quirky celebrations. These events often serve as a moment of fun amidst life's monotony, evoking laughter and camaraderie rather than any profound underlying significance.

Addressing the Question: Celebration or Desistance?

My stance on holiday celebrations is that of rational desistance rather than blind desistence. When someone questions the celebration of a holiday based on its obscure origins, I suggest the following: consider the event's meaning and impact on society rather than its historical accuracy. For instance, the precise dates of birth for two of my six children were unknown when they were adopted. We chose a day to honor their birthdays, even if these dates are unlikely to be exact. The celebration itself is more about acknowledging and celebrating life's milestones than the exact details of when they occurred.

In conclusion, the decision to celebrate a holiday should stem from personal belief and the value it brings to one's life rather than the obscure origins or historical accuracy. While the origins of many holidays might be clouded or unknown, the spirit of celebration can still hold significant meaning. It is ultimately up to us, as individuals, to decide whether we celebrate these events out of cultural tradition or individual conviction.