Introduction
Recently, a study by the CDC has sparked significant debate and concern. According to the report, unvaccinated people are 29 times more likely to land in the hospital with COVID-19 than those who have received the vaccination. This finding has led to widespread scrutiny, particularly given the context of vaccine manufacturers' influence on both data and media narratives.
Questioning the CDC and Pfizer Data
Theometown's headline, "Corrupt Agencies Have Corrupt Data. Pfizer Has Captured Them," highlights the growing skepticism surrounding the reliability of the CDC's and nearby agencies' data. Critics argue that these organizations are being influenced by pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer. One argument goes that any results presented by Pfizer should be reversed to obtain the true picture.
An internet search for "Shockingly CDC Now Lists Vaccinated Deaths as Unvaccinated" reveals a substantial backwash of accusations towards the CDC. This unification of vaccinated and unvaccinated deaths because of the high death rate from vaccine side effects further fuels conspiracy theories. Similarly, the search "This South Australian Nurse Is a Hero Dropping Truth Bombs" points to individuals like the nurse who are bravely revealing the truth.
The Influence of Pfizer
Pfizer's power over the news media has been another focal point of contention. The search "Pfizer Has Captured The News Media Too" indicates a perception of media manipulation by large pharmaceutical companies. This dominance limits the public's access to unaltered information, as evident in the search term "MAX VAX DIE OFF STUNS SCIENTISTS!"
High Death Rates and Market Continuation
Despite numerous deaths reported, including over 28,000 in the first three months alone, the vaccine continues to be administered. The death toll of 1,200 in the first three months from the vaccine had already triggered the removal of other vaccines when only 25 deaths were reported. Currently, the market remains functional, with no clear end to vaccination as government orders seem to be the sole inhibitor.
Conspiracy Theories and Depopulation
Conspiracy theories abound, with searches such as "How Globalists Justify Depopulation - The New American" pointing to depopulation as a possible objective. Another disturbing search term is "Scientists: Look One-Third of the Human Race Has to Die," which suggests a belief that depopulation is happening on a grand scale. Even Dr. Fauci, often cited as a spokesman for science, seems to condone mass death through his endorsement of treatments and protocols.
Critical Analysis of Medical Protocols and Ethics
Dr. Fauci's funding of a study using Remdesivir, a drug associated with significant patient deaths, has raised eyebrows. His push for the use of this drug, despite only funding the study, leads to accusations of corruption. The link between hospitals receiving federal funding based on following Dr. Fauci's protocols further complicates the issue. The unethical practice of profiting from the deaths of patients tormented by renal failure is another point of contention. This practice has been linked to significant excess deaths, a phenomenon unprecedented in modern history.
Legal Challenges and Future Directions
The ongoing legal challenges against Dr. Fauci and others for their alleged crimes against humanity highlight the drastic measures being taken to hold key figures accountable. Texas Court cases are a critical development in this context, providing a venue for public and legal scrutiny.
Conclusion
The landscape of vaccine efficacy and its implications is fraught with controversy and ethical dilemmas. As more data and evidence emerge, the public continues to question the motives and actions of key figures and institutions. It is crucial to maintain an open and transparent dialogue to ensure that public health efforts align with ethical and scientific standards.