Introduction

The

in Ethiopia has been subject to extensive scrutiny and media attention, with a significant portion of the narrative placing blame on Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

However, a recent video has provided new insights that challenge this narrative, offering a more nuanced understanding of the incident. In this article, we will delve into the complexities of the situation, including the roles of Boeing, the FAA, and the pilots involved. We will also discuss the importance of pilot proficiency and emergency procedures in commercial aviation.

The Role of Boeing and the FAA

Boeing and the FAA are both considered to have a responsibility in the 737 MAX crash. Boeing, as the manufacturer of the aircraft, has faced scrutiny over the MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System) software that is believed to have contributed to the crash. The FAA, as the regulatory body, has been criticized for its oversight of the 737 MAX design and certification process.

The Pilots' Role

The pilots' actions during the incident have been a focal point of the debate. The video argues that the pilots did not follow the specified emergency procedures, which may explain the series of events leading to the crash. Let us break down this claim and explore its validity.

Pilot Proficiency and Training

Pilots are well-versed in the fact that it is the human factor, not the plane, that is often the root cause of aviation accidents. In this case, the pilots, while experienced, may have faced unique challenges due to their limited flying time. Krishna Kumar Subramanian, a pilot with extensive experience, highlights the critical role of pilot training and experience. The copilot in the Ethiopian MAX crash, for instance, had only 200 hours of flying time, which is a significant factor in their ability to handle an emergency situation effectively.

Emergency Procedures and MCAS Activation

The video emphasizes that the pilots were not following the emergency procedure correctly, including not reducing throttle after takeoff. This decision may have contributed to the MCAS system activating, which in turn led to the plane's pitch up and subsequent loss of control. The video argues that both Boeing and the FAA have responsibilities, as well as the pilots, to ensure that emergency procedures are correctly followed.

Role of International Pilots

Another aspect highlighted by the video is the difference in pilot training and experience between American and international pilots. It is noted that American pilots have been flying the 737 MAX longer and have faced similar emergencies, demonstrating their ability to handle such situations effectively. This suggests that the difference in outcomes may be due to a combination of factors, including training, experience, and proficiency.

Conclusion

The Ethiopian 737 MAX crash is a complex issue that involves multiple factors, including regulatory oversight, aircraft design, and pilot proficiency. While Boeing and the FAA have their responsibilities, the video presented offers valuable insights into the actions of the pilots and the challenges they faced. A comprehensive and balanced analysis is essential for a thorough understanding of this incident.

Final Thoughts

It is imperative that future investigations into aviation accidents are based on a thorough and fact-based examination of all contributing factors. The insights provided by professional pilots, like Krishna Kumar Subramanian, are invaluable in understanding the complexities of such incidents and in improving future safety measures.

References

For further reading, consider the following references: